المحتوى الاتصالي للدبلوماسية الشعبية «الإسرائيلية » من منظور العلاقات العامة الدولية دراسة تحليلية لصفحة إسرائيل باللهجة العراقية عبر الفيس بوك

خلف  كريم كيوش; عراك  غانم محمد

doi:10.33282/abaa.v13i52.769

Authors

Khalaf kareem kyoosh Wasit Université - Collège of Arts - Département of Media
Arrak Ghanem Muhammad Wasit Université - Collège of Arts - Département of Media

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33282/abaa.v13i52.769

Keywords:

international public relations - public diplomacy - social networking sites -

Abstract

This study deals with the conceptual rooting of the practical relationship between the practice of international public relations and popular diplomacy, as the latter sought - as a legitimate extension of traditional diplomacy - to involve foreign residents in international public relations capable of drawing a positive image of the state among people of other countries, by employing modern communication technology. Especially social media, which led to a shift from old diplomacy to digital public diplomacy. The research paper seeks to analyze the communicative content of the Facebook page (Israel in the Iraqi dialect), which a page is belonging to the "Israeli" Ministry of Foreign Affairs that aims, according to its messages, to encourage dialogue between "Israelis" and Iraqis. The study aims to know the methods and tactics that "Israel" used in its communication contents to market it to the public Iraqi. Therefore, the researchers used the descriptive approach and the content analysis method to analyze the communicative content of popular diplomacy via Facebook, for the period from 8/13/2020 to 10/13/2020. The two researchers reached a set of results, the most important of which is that "Israel" used social networking sites in a manner appropriate to build its image in front of other people, especially the Iraqi people, by focusing on the topic of "Iraqi-Jewish rapprochement" and using the Iraqi dialect .

References

راسم محمد الجمال. ) 2009 (. العلاقات العامة الدولية والاتصال بين الثقافات .
القاهرة : الدارالمصرية اللبنانية .
-2 يسرا حسني. ) 2015 (. العلاقات العامة والدبلوماسية الشعبية. الجيزة: اطلس
للانتاج الاعلامي
Candace White∗, D. R. (2014). Comparative public diplomacy:
Message strategiesof countries in transition,. Public Relations
Review, 320.
2. Cuil, N. (2009). public diplomacy . lessons from the past.: CPD
perspectibes on public diplomacy .
3. Gilboa.E. (2005). New public diplomacy in the 2 lst century. A
compaarative study of policy and practice .: routedge.
4. KimJ (( 2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.09.008.).
Public relations and public diplomacy in cultural and educational
exchange programs: A coorientational approach to the Humphrey
Program . . Public Relations Review , 138.
5. Kiml, J. (2015). Public relations and public diplomacy in cultural
andeducational exchange programs: A coorientational
approachto the Humphrey Program. Public Relations Review,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.09.008., 183.
6. Lacey Milama, ∗. E. (2011). Apps4Africa: A new State Department
public diplomacy initiative. Public Relations Review, 330.
7. Malone, G. (1985). Managing public diplomacy. . washington:
Quateriy,8(3).
8. Mogensen, K. (2017). From public relations to corporate public
diplomacyhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.03.011. Public
Relations Review, 502.
9. Osama Albishria .)2019.( .Mediated public diplomacy in the digital
age: Exploring the Saudi and the U.S. governments ’agenda-
building during Trump’s visit to the Middle East .,Public Rela
tions Review https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.101820.133 ،,
10. Rasmus Kjærgaard Rasmussena, ∗. H. (2012). The new PR of
states: How nation branding practices affect the. Public Relations
Review, 811.
11. Ruixue Jia, W. L. (2019). Public diplomacy networks: China’s
public diplomacy. Public Relations Review, 445.
12. Schroeder, N. U. (2018). Turkey’s Twitter public diplomacy:
Towards a “new” cult of https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.
2019.101837. Public Relations Review,, 201.
13. White, C. &. (2014). Comparative public diplomacy: Message
strategies of countries. Public Relations Review http://dx.doi.
org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.01.012, 177.
14. White, C. &. (2014). . Comparative public diplomacy: Message
strategies of countries. Public Relations Review http://dx.doi.
org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.01.012, 220.
15. Wise, K. (2009). Public relations and health diplomacy. Public
Relations Review, 128.
16. Xin Zhonga, b. J. (2013). Public Relations ReviewPublic, 545.
17. Xin Zhonga, b. J. (2013). Public diplomacy meets social media:
A study of the U.S.Embassy’s blogs and micro-blogs. Public Relations
Review, 546.
18. Zaharna, R. &. (2015). The challenge from the 4th quadrant of
a relational public diplomacy model https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.
2015.07.006. . Public Relations Review, 42(1),, 301.