DOMINATION OF CONTENT OVER FORM IS ONE OF THE PROBLEMS OF CHILDREN’S STORIES IN IRAQ

Abstract

The stories of children in Iraq during the past two decades have received a number of important scientific studies. Despite tyranny of the historical study method on most of these studies, they have been and still are very important, because they have established a chronicle of this literary style that has been neglected and based not only on the academic level and serious in-depth university studies but also on the enclosed sight that doesn’t consider studied art as an innovation with its specificity and its typical technical components. While many of the public impressions and self-reflections contributed to the dominance of some of the provisions and concepts that were circulated as critical remarks and adopted by some writers and accusers in as conclusive judgments, which are even more so because they did not result from a specific monetary approach or clear critique. 

It is likely that the historical aspect of the emergence of this story in Iraq and its evolutionary pathways has been adapted to disallow any new study to add something to what was founded and built on, because of the diminishing opportunities to find new texts that contribute to changing some of the convictions or extending them to correct the evolutionary track of the history of this story, as well as its study according to a critical approach ensures that the researcher can reach critical results by monitoring the transformations of the artistic structures of this story until it reaches an advanced stage of maturity and completeness as presented by some contemporary models of this story. 

Through the texts that are written - today - is to write them in a way that puts it in the ranks of creative developed works ... this research attempt in this direction.